Oct 09
I’ve enjoyed reading various posts for and against the award – the pro-award and anti-award camps.

One thing this award has done is to cast in stark relief those that do not understand the moment.

We have the two extremes:
- the pro-award crowd who think it’s great but don’t really think about why.
- the anti-award crowd who think it’s a farce but fail to produce any arguments that would garner higher than a C grade in 9th grade English.

Then we have the two middle groups:
- the anti-award crowd who have valid arguments. Sometimes they still stoop to insult tossing.
- the pro-award crowd that have valid arguments. Sometimes they still stoop to glassy-eyed dreaminess.

I fall into the last category and attempt to remain steadfast (i.e. still thinking without the glassy-eyed bit). This is a fantastic development. Obama has worked hard to bring hundreds of thousands of new people into politics who before couldn’t have cared less – they didn’t vote at all. A voting populace is not necessarily and informed populace but it’s a start.

The US is one of (if not THE) most power nation in the world and we set precedents left and right. The fact that a majority our populace had stopped participating in the leadership of the country went mostly unnoticed (because they weren’t participating… lol) until the leadership began warmongering, ignoring fact, ignoring science, and ignoring world peace protests. Suddenly the populace seemed to wake up. Unfortunately, they lacked a cohesive force. Obama is that glue that allowed Americans to hold hands once more.

He uses logical arguments. He uses technology instead of fearing it. He talks to everyone. He uses Youtube instead of the radio. Talk about getting with the times! When criticized, he explains his thinking instead of cowardly reversing his opinion. It is amazing to me that we have a President with the will to do what needs to get done and the courage to back up his viewpoints with pointed arguments. It’s fantastic!

And the Peace Prize folks seem to understand this as well. Obama has gone to great lengths to encourage the US government to talk with its enemies. His use of diplomacy instead of just threatening everyone is so beyond high-school that part of me thinks the country might be starting to grow up.

Now, I would be willing to agree that it may be a little premature but – think of the encouragement it gives the Obama Presidency! It is incredibly difficult to push on against tons of people trying to pull you down. This prize is like a beam of light from on high shining on Obama and encouraging him to push onward.

May the willfully ignorant discover their close-minded ways and weep.
Jan 08

Starting last year, it became illegal in California to hold a cell phone to your ear while driving a motor vehicle. Then in an addendum, they added sending text-messages to the list of no-no’s. If speaking on your cell phone while driving was the culprit, then the law should have made it illegal to talk on the phone. But no, it’s a “hands free” law. A huge boon for head-set manufacturers who have the law on their side. I bet their sales jumped when that law went into effect.

Distractions while driving? What about friends chatting with you and laughing or taunting you from the back seat? How about normal activities like changing your CD player? Adjusting the radio? Reading billboards? Or how about what some people do and other things I’ve heard people do regularly like eating? Applying makeup!? Reading newspapers!? Shaving!?

This is a perfect example of treating the symptom and not the disease. The disease here is poor education and poor emphasis on safe driving. I took a defensive drivers class a year or so ago and it was four hours of instruction on safe driving. I didn’t particularly enjoy it since I feel I’m a pretty safe driver anyway and took the class to get my Defensive Driver’s Card. But the class was a fantastic example of what should be done. I came out of there thinking, “Wow! That should be REQUIRED for EVERY driver.” For me it was about 75% known and 25% new material but I know many people would see it vice-versa.

It’s mildly entertaining to read articles like Ore. teens largely ignoring cell phone driving ban in which studies are quoted as not showing improvements.

This law is a distraction; a useless piece of legislation to quiet the masses and to say “Look, we’re doing something!” I hope we having smarter law makers some day who can stand up to the masses and point out what is really bothering them rather than having knee-jerk reactions and writing dumb laws.

—- BEGIN RANT —-
If I am driving down the freeway in traffic and I am on my cell to my Dad and suddenly there are brake lights everywhere, I yell “GOTTA DRIVE!” into the phone and chuck it to the passenger seat, immediately directing my full attention to the road. When things have cooled down, I pick up the phone and continue my conversation. I do not send text-messages while driving or email, I don’t read newspapers or shave. I do eat quite often. An apple makes a nice driving snack; heck changing gears is tougher than eating an apple.

Frankly, I am more concerned about the complete lack of understanding at least 50% of drivers seem to have for how to proceed at a 4-way stop sign. Signaling is a courtesy yes; would it kill you to be courteous? Blind spots are called blind spots for a reason. If you are on a curvy road and your phone falls just out of your reach, please use your brain. Pull over, retrieve the phone (feel free to swear about it), and then continue.

I am pissed off that my safe driving experience is now interrupted by me having to put on and off a headset when I get in and out of the car. Or if I forgot my headset, I just make sure it’s night time when you cannot tell I’m on the phone or I put the phone on speaker phone. Unless an officer is looking down into my car from above, they are not going to be able to see if I am on my cell phone. Officially I believe speaker-phone does not count as “hands free”. WTF is up with that? Talk about a law made by head-set companies!?
—- END RANT —-

Oct 10

When I worked for a time as a dish washer at the Saturn Cafe in Santa Cruz, we would have these meetings where all employees would talk. During the meetings, if one employee said something that explained your feelings, instead of repeating what they said, you could say “Eric is my ambassador.”

I spend a great deal of time reading news blogs and while many of them are lacking in insight and detail, there are some gems that are so well written (or at least are to me anyway). I felt that over time, my writing on this blog would improve and I feel it has somewhat but linking other articles together and stringing together insightful information seems to be out of my reach for now.

When I find these articles, I want to show them to others but mostly I just want to save copies of them so that I can refer to them later.  So I’m creating a category called “Ambassadors” where I can kind of save a links to articles and posts that I really like.

To start it off, here’s an article I was reading and felt was a great critique. It wasn’t until near the end of the post that I noticed it was from a non-US source, “Away from her friends on Fox, Palin folds like a cheap suit” by Kevin Cullen:
http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/world/2008/1009/1223445617076.html

And a “Commentary: Why Ayers case is risky for McCain-Palin” by Roland Martin:
http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/10/07/martin.townhall/

Rss Feed Facebook button Myspace button Linkedin button Youtube button

Video & Audio Comments are proudly powered by Riffly